Position 25 / 64
The Rooster
A dynamic position where the man is in a dominant position, similar to the posture of a rooster.

Understanding the posture
The Rooster places both partners facing the same direction and calls for particular attention to pace. In this guide, “The Rooster” describes a body arrangement, not a performance target. Body shape, mobility and personal preferences matter more than copying an image exactly.
Step-by-step setup
The front partner chooses their support and torso angle first. The rear partner moves closer only once the posture feels stable.
- Agree who will guide the pace and choose an immediate stop signal.
- Enter the posture slowly, without jolting or forcing a joint.
- Begin with a small range and adjust only while both partners remain relaxed.
- Use a stable bed edge at a height that works for both partners.
Comfort and communication
Held breath, unusual tension or numbness are cues to slow down, change support or stop. A cushion and a new angle are often more useful than extra effort.
Consent is specific, enthusiastic and reversible at any time. A posture accepted at the start can be stopped without explanation.
- Use a slow, even pace; coordination matters more than speed.
Adapt and simplify
This posture takes some coordination. Begin with its most stable form and add movements one at a time.
To vary the posture without losing control, change one parameter at a time: direction, height, leg opening or support.
Name and context
“The Rooster” is used here as a modern editorial label. Names and drawings vary widely between contemporary books; this guide does not claim that this exact form belongs to a canonical Kamasutra passage.
Sources and context
Modern position names vary between publishers. This collection uses descriptive labels and does not claim to reproduce a canonical catalogue from the Sanskrit text.
- World Health Organization — Sexual health
- Planned Parenthood — Sexual consent
- Vātsyāyana, Kamasutra, traduction Wendy Doniger et Sudhir Kakar, Oxford University Press, 2002.









